May 18, 2013
Farm Bill FAQs

wereallfedup:

modfarm:

image

Got questions about the farm bill? We’ve got answers.

Keepin it simple over at Modern Farmer.

Time to start watching Congress again. 

March 30, 2013

fertilizermarkets:

United States of Monsanto: GMO giant is now litigation proof. After President Obama signed the Agriculture Appropriations Bill into law on Tuesday, hundreds of thousands of people have voiced their opposition to H.R. 933. A provision in the law known as the “Monsanto Protection Act” protects the biotech industry from being sued in a court of law. The Farmer Assurance provision takes the Federal Court’s right to halt the sale and use of genetically modified seed crops regardless of health risks. Jeffrey M. Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, joins us to discuss.

Find RT America in your area: http://rt.com/where-to-watch/
Or watch us online: http://rt.com/on-air/rt-america-air/

March 26, 2013
‘Monsanto Protection Act’ slips silently through US Congress

See http://rt.com/usa/monsanto-congress-silently-slips-830/ 

This entry caught my attention not because of its content, but its source. The ‘RT’ in RT.com stands for Russian Times. I never dreamt that I would turn to the Russian press for a cogent analysis of American politics.

March 25, 2013
thedailywhat:

White House Petition of the Day: Make Legislators Wear Logos of Corporate Backers
The latest brilliant idea to come out of We The People website is this petition suggesting that lawmakers should be required to be more transparent about their financial backers by wearing logos of their corporate “sponsors,” just like the NASCAR drivers do. As of Thursday evening, it has accrued more than 9,000 of the 100,000 signatures it needs to be formally addressed by the White House. GOOD magazine previously explored this idea with photoshopped mockups of New York Senator Charles Schumer and Florida Senator Marco Rubio donning logo patches of their contributors on their suits.
Hat tip goes to Dangerous Minds.

thedailywhat:

White House Petition of the Day: Make Legislators Wear Logos of Corporate Backers

The latest brilliant idea to come out of We The People website is this petition suggesting that lawmakers should be required to be more transparent about their financial backers by wearing logos of their corporate “sponsors,” just like the NASCAR drivers do. As of Thursday evening, it has accrued more than 9,000 of the 100,000 signatures it needs to be formally addressed by the White House. GOOD magazine previously explored this idea with photoshopped mockups of New York Senator Charles Schumer and Florida Senator Marco Rubio donning logo patches of their contributors on their suits.

Hat tip goes to Dangerous Minds.

(via adriannegoesfarming)

January 1, 2013
The Farm Bill Has Been Extended A Year- kinda sorta maybe

Or Not. 

First, I need to credit audralewicki and agrithoughts, as well as the intrepid staff at NPR, for paying attention even on Sunday. But as far as I can tell, the only thing that has happened is that the House and Senate Ag committees have agreed to the terms of A farm bill. With, in the case of the House, several variations. I’m not even sure what the consensus was in the committees. The House Ag committee website doesn’t yet mention any action later than December 20, not to mention on New Year’s Day. This while some of us were engaged in watching our beloved Cornhuskers humiliate themselves. 

There haven’t been any press releases from the USDA, nor any indication at house.gov that there has been floor action on H.R. 6083. 

I still think that we’ll first see an administrative action, and then the greater part of the bill will be wrapped into the spending / debt ceiling fight when the new Congress is seated. 

audralewicki:

agrithoughts:

Some of us were out celebrating the New Year, some were sleeping and the government was dealing.

Looks like the current Farm Bill will be extended a year.

I guess the threat of high milk prices has inspired some action, though seemingly half-hearted. http://www.npr.org/2012/12/30/168311665/agricultural-committees-agree-to-farm-bill-extension

(via agvocacy)

December 30, 2012
Why Should Young People Care About The Farm Bill?

A short USDA blog from earlier in December explaining what the Farm Bill does. While the blog is good, also read the comments. I don’t know whether they are comments from “young people” or not, but if so, I have no concerns about the future of public policy in the U.S. during the next quarter century. 

December 30, 2012
UPDATE 2-US Senate, House ag committees in deal to avert milk price spike

Both Reuters and AP are reporting possible short term breakthroughs on the U.S.  farm bill, with a Monday vote and Tuesday (New Year’s Day?!) signing a possibility. The title links to Jim Wolf’s more complete Reuters report. The Associated Press item can be found here

After the humiliating behavior of the House Republican caucus this past month, I’m not holding my breath. 

Please note the conflict in the interests of dairy farmers and industrial processors over production levels. Unfortunately the server is slow this evening at opensecrets.org , my usual “go to” site for industry lobbying news. I’ll post something at a later date explaining the use of that excellent site provided by the Center for Responsive Politics.  BUT LOOK! I wrote too soon. As I was typing that statement their server delivered this analysis written yesterday, December 28. 

December 23, 2012
Back Door Farm Bill

Another perspective on the farm bill, this from Daniel Imhoff writing in the Atlantic. While the bill’s relation to the fiscal cliff is focused on cost cutting, agri-business lobbyists have taken the opportunity to work on the non-fiscal edges. Among the proposals in the House version are:

  • Restrictions on states’ rights to regulate food and agriculture.
  • Fast-tracked genetically engineered (GMO) crop approval. 
  •  Weakened pesticide regulation. 
  •  Reversing anti-monopoly reforms.

BTW, back in March Imhoff penned a series of three excellent under the title “Overhauling the Farm Bill” and classified by The Atlantic as in their “health” category rather than politics. You can links to them here.

(Source: meearth)

December 22, 2012
With Farm Bill Stalled, Consumers May Face Soaring Milk Prices
Some weeks past I linked to an article suggesting that if the farm bill failed to pass by December 31, and it increasingly looks like it will not, then the immediate consequences would be….. not much. Now Ron Nixon of the NY Times presents an alternative scenario while leaving open the possibility that administrative actions could delay the most expensive consequences until Congress acts. $8.00 a gallon milk! Would that my father-in-law, may his memory be eternal, could have seen it. 
Observe also that the Tea Party Republicans with a largely rural base of support have little political incentive to forestall this crisis. And if things play out this way, we should hit the debt ceiling all that much sooner. 
Click the picture to go to the NY Times article. 

With Farm Bill Stalled, Consumers May Face Soaring Milk Prices

Some weeks past I linked to an article suggesting that if the farm bill failed to pass by December 31, and it increasingly looks like it will not, then the immediate consequences would be….. not much. Now Ron Nixon of the NY Times presents an alternative scenario while leaving open the possibility that administrative actions could delay the most expensive consequences until Congress acts. $8.00 a gallon milk! Would that my father-in-law, may his memory be eternal, could have seen it. 

Observe also that the Tea Party Republicans with a largely rural base of support have little political incentive to forestall this crisis. And if things play out this way, we should hit the debt ceiling all that much sooner. 

Click the picture to go to the NY Times article. 

December 18, 2012
Crop insurance juicy target in 'fiscal cliff' deal

If you know nothing about the current use of crop insurance in U.S. agriculture I encourage to check the (too) brief entry in Wikipedia. But in short, the program is why this summer you read about one of the worst droughts in the recent history of the Corn Belt, and didn’t read about farm foreclosures this fall.

While the news of the approaching fiscal cliff has been filling media time there hasn’t been much mention recently that the existing farm programs also expire December 31. It’s almost a certainty that any real spending adjustments in the federal budget will have to include a discussion of agriculture subsidies. 

The following is extracted from an AP piece by M.C. Jalonick on 12/15/12…

“While cutting food stamps and other farm programs, both the Senate and House agriculture bills preserve crop insurance subsidies that cover a big portion of farmers’ losses due to bad weather. Those subsidies buoyed a strong agricultural economy even through last summer’s scorching drought. Committee leaders from both parties say farmers consistently tell them crop insurance is the program they depend on most.

But both bills also create an insurance program that would give farmers additional protection against any kind of revenue losses, such as from a drop in commodity prices. The Senate bill’s version would cost almost $3 billion annually, with the House bill a little under $1 billion.”

Liked posts on Tumblr: More liked posts »