It’s rare that I find myself in agreement with Fox News if that is the source of this story, but bully for agriculture! About two years ago The Daily Beast / Newsweek listed three or four ag related trades on their list of the 20 most useless degrees. FAIL.
Their claimed methodology seemed perfectly reasonable and with the exception of the food and agriculture sector the results matched what we all intuit. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and a group called Payscale they identified those degrees “offer(ing) not only the fewest job opportunities, but those that tend to pay the least. The Daily Beast considered the following data points, weighted equally, with each degree’s numbers compared to the average for each category, to achieve a categorical comparison that accounts for differentiation from the mean.” They looked at “1.) starting and mid-career salary levels, using the profession most associated with the degree, 2.) the expected change in the total number of jobs from 2008-2018, (and) 3.) the expected percentage change in available jobs from 2008-2018.”
I’m not sure where the analysis went awry but I suspect that there are relatively fewer agriculture majors, and that sector salaries may be conditioned by the large number of unskilled positions not requiring academic degrees.
Ag folks didn’t let this pass unnoticed. The venerable Hoard’s Dairyman called them out on it. They were similarly perplexed and added to the critique by reminding readers that a $35K starting salary in rural America buys a good deal more than it does in Greenpoint or Williamsburg, Brooklyn.
BTW, if you’re not familiar with Hoard’s visit their website. Their print subscription is probably one of the best media values there is: 60 issues over three years for only $1.66 each. And any date or prospective in-law spying it amongst your magazines will look at you with new found wonder and respect.
agvocacy:
Wondering what drives people toward a career in agriculture? Well, the job prospect sure does help!
(via agrithoughts)